1976 BMW 633 vs. 1998 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 1998 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 BMW 633. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 BMW 633 would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 BMW 633 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1976 BMW 633. (194 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1976 BMW 633. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 120 kg more than 1976 BMW 633. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 BMW 633 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 BMW 633. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 BMW 633 | 1998 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | BMW | Daewoo |
| Model | 633 | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3210 cc | 3206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 194 HP | 202 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4960 mm |
