1976 BMW 633 vs. 1999 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1999 Mazda Midge is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 BMW 633. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 BMW 633 would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 BMW 633 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 BMW 633 (194 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1999 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 BMW 633 should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 BMW 633 weights approximately 504 kg more than 1999 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 BMW 633 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 BMW 633. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 BMW 633 | 1999 Mazda Midge | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 633 | Midge |
Year Released | 1976 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 194 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |