1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Karmann Asso di Quadri | 62 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 98.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3300 mm |