1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 530 kg more than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Karmann Asso di Quadri | 62 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 2030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3300 mm |