1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri weights approximately 834 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | BMW | DAF |
| Model | Karmann Asso di Quadri | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2060 mm |
