1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri vs. 1979 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1979 Ford Falcon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Ford Falcon (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri weights approximately 120 kg more than 1979 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri | 1979 Ford Falcon | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | Karmann Asso di Quadri | Falcon |
Year Released | 1976 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3271 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2830 mm |