1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri vs. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri weights approximately 350 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri | 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Karmann Asso di Quadri | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1976 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2580 mm |