1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri vs. 1986 Ford Orion
To start off, 1986 Ford Orion is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri weights approximately 600 kg more than 1986 Ford Orion.
Because 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Orion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri | 1986 Ford Orion | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | Karmann Asso di Quadri | Orion |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2410 mm |
