1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (122 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri weights approximately 105 kg more than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | Karmann Asso di Quadri | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2464 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 98.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 81 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2380 mm |