1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri vs. 2003 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2003 Ford Econovan is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri weights approximately 205 kg more than 2003 Ford Econovan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri | 2003 Ford Econovan | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | Karmann Asso di Quadri | Econovan |
Year Released | 1976 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2210 mm |