1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri (109 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | Karmann Asso di Quadri | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1976 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 94 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2490 mm |