1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (276 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri weights approximately 420 kg more than 2010 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2010 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | Karmann Asso di Quadri | Tundra |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3230 mm |