1976 Bristol 412 vs. 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (238 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1976 Bristol 412. (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1976 Bristol 412.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (467 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Bristol 412. (422 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Bristol 412.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Bristol 412 | 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
| Model | 412 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6555 cc | 5735 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 422 Nm | 467 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2580 mm |
