1976 Bristol 412 vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Bristol 412 (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Bristol 412 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Bristol 412 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1999 Renault Zo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Bristol 412 (422 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Zo. (260 Nm). This means 1976 Bristol 412 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Zo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Bristol 412 | 1999 Renault Zo | |
| Make | Bristol | Renault |
| Model | 412 | Zo |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 6555 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 422 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1575 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2580 mm |
