1976 Bristol 412 vs. 2001 Chevrolet Camaro

To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Bristol 412 weights approximately 170 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Bristol 412 (422 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. (271 Nm). This means 1976 Bristol 412 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. 1976 Bristol 412 has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Bristol 412 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Bristol 412 2001 Chevrolet Camaro
Make Bristol Chevrolet
Model 412 Camaro
Year Released 1976 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6555 cc 3400 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 208 HP 0 HP
Torque 422 Nm 271 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1710 kg 1540 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4910 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 2910 mm 2570 mm