1976 Bristol 412 vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1976 Bristol 412. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1976 Bristol 412.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Bristol 412 (422 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (407 Nm). This means 1976 Bristol 412 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Bristol 412 | 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Bristol | Land Rover |
| Model | 412 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6555 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 222 HP |
| Torque | 422 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2550 mm |
