1976 Bristol 412 vs. 2001 Renault Clio
To start off, 2001 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Renault Clio (230 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1976 Bristol 412. (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1976 Bristol 412. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Bristol 412 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2001 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Bristol 412 (422 Nm) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 1976 Bristol 412 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Bristol 412 | 2001 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Bristol | Renault |
| Model | 412 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6555 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 422 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2750 mm |
