1976 Bristol 412 vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1976 Bristol 412. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1976 Bristol 412. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 1 kg more than 1976 Bristol 412. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Bristol 412 (422 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lincoln LS. (388 Nm). This means 1976 Bristol 412 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Bristol 412 | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Bristol | Lincoln |
Model | 412 | LS |
Year Released | 1976 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6555 cc | 3931 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 422 Nm | 388 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1711 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3030 mm |