1976 Bristol 412 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Bristol 412 (208 HP) has 65 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Bristol 412 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2009 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Bristol 412 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 412 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6555 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2490 mm |