1976 Bristol 412 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1976 Bristol 412. (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1976 Bristol 412. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Bristol 412 weights approximately 519 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.

Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Bristol 412 (422 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1976 Bristol 412 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Bristol 412 2009 Mazda CX-9
Make Bristol Mazda
Model 412 CX-9
Year Released 1976 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6555 cc 3724 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 208 HP 273 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 422 Nm 366 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1710 kg 1191 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2910 mm 2880 mm