1976 Bristol 412 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Bristol 412 (208 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2010 Jaguar XF. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Bristol 412 should accelerate faster than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Bristol 412. (422 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Bristol 412.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Bristol 412 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Bristol | Jaguar |
Model | 412 | XF |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6555 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 422 Nm | 450 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2908 mm |