1976 Bristol 603 vs. 1982 Dodge Omni
To start off, 1982 Dodge Omni is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Bristol 603. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Bristol 603 would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Bristol 603 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Bristol 603 weights approximately 790 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 1976 Bristol 603 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Bristol 603. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Bristol 603 | 1982 Dodge Omni | |
Make | Bristol | Dodge |
Model | 603 | Omni |
Year Released | 1976 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5210 cc | 1716 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 225 km/hour | 146 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 49 L |