1976 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1976 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 8,192 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1976 Cadillac Eldorado. (204 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1976 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 435 kg more than 1962 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Cadillac Eldorado | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Eldorado | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1976 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8192 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2310 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 101 L | 40 L |