1976 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1952 Fiat Campagnola
To start off, 1976 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Chevrolet Camaro (143 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 335 kg more than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chevrolet Camaro | 1952 Fiat Campagnola | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Camaro | Campagnola |
Year Released | 1976 | 1952 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5735 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2260 mm |