1976 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1956 Saab 92B
To start off, 1976 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Saab 92B would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 800 kg more than 1956 Saab 92B.
Because 1976 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chevrolet Camaro | 1956 Saab 92B | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
| Model | Camaro | 92B |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1956 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 5735 cc | 763 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2480 mm |
