1976 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1976 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chevrolet Camaro | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Camaro | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 5736 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2250 mm |
