1976 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100
To start off, 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 8,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chevrolet Camaro | 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Camaro | 100 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5736 cc | 8998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3480 mm |