1976 Chevrolet Pickup vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chevrolet Pickup. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chevrolet Pickup would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Chevrolet Pickup is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Chevrolet Pickup. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chevrolet Pickup. (407 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chevrolet Pickup. 1976 Chevrolet Pickup has automatic transmission and 1999 Holden Maloo has manual transmission. 1999 Holden Maloo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Chevrolet Pickup will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chevrolet Pickup | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Pickup | Maloo |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3276 cc | 5699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 542 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
