1976 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1956 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1976 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Chevrolet Suburban (100 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 990 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chevrolet Suburban | 1956 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Suburban | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4093 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2540 mm |
