1976 Chrysler 160 vs. 1973 Holden UTE
To start off, 1976 Chrysler 160 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,047 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Holden UTE (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Holden UTE (427 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1973 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chrysler 160 | 1973 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | 160 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 5047 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1390 mm |
