1976 Chrysler 160 vs. 1974 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1976 Chrysler 160 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-2 (119 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1974 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chrysler 160 | 1974 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | 160 | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2480 mm |
