1976 Chrysler 160 vs. 1978 Mazda 616
To start off, 1978 Mazda 616 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Chrysler 160 (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 173 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Chrysler 160 (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1976 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 160 | 1978 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 160 | 616 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2480 mm |