1976 Chrysler 160 vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Chrysler 160 (89 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Chrysler 160 (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1976 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 160 | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Chrysler | Fiat |
Model | 160 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1976 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 132 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2450 mm |