1976 Chrysler 160 vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 160 | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 160 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1976 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4690 mm |