1976 Chrysler 160 vs. 2000 Citroen C3

To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen C3 (109 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 195 kg more than 2000 Citroen C3.

Because 1976 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Chrysler 160 (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1976 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Chrysler 160 2000 Citroen C3
Make Chrysler Citroen
Model 160 C3
Year Released 1976 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1639 cc 1587 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 109 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 132 Nm 110 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1085 kg 890 kg
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 3860 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1540 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2760 mm