1976 Chrysler 160 vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 679 kg more than 1976 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 160 | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
Model | 160 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1976 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |