1976 Chrysler 160 vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 153 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 160. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 160 | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | 160 | UTE |
Year Released | 1976 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 132 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |