1976 Chrysler 160 vs. 2009 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2009 Ford Fusion is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Fusion (158 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Because 1976 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Fusion (156 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 160 | 2009 Ford Fusion | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 160 | Fusion |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1840 mm |