1976 Chrysler 160 vs. 2009 Scion xB
To start off, 2009 Scion xB is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Scion xB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Scion xB (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Scion xB should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Because 1976 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Scion xB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Scion xB (162 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Scion xB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 160 | 2009 Scion xB | |
Make | Chrysler | Scion |
Model | 160 | xB |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |