1976 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 189 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 160. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 160 | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | 160 | Calais |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 132 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |