1976 Chrysler 160 vs. 2011 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-V is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 160. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Because 1976 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm). This means 2011 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chrysler 160 | 2011 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Chrysler | Honda |
| Model | 160 | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4554 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1819 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2619 mm |
