1976 Chrysler 160 vs. 2012 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2012 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Because 2012 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2012 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 160 | 2012 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | 160 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1976 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2640 mm |