1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1948 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 1976 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Chrysler 1609 (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1948 Studebaker Commander. (94 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 1948 Studebaker Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 358 kg more than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chrysler 1609 | 1948 Studebaker Commander | |
| Make | Chrysler | Studebaker |
| Model | 1609 | Commander |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1812 cc | 3703 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1458 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3030 mm |
