1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1954 GAZ M-20
To start off, 1976 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Chrysler 1609 (59 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1954 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 1954 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Chrysler 1609 (126 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1976 Chrysler 1609 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chrysler 1609 | 1954 GAZ M-20 | |
| Make | Chrysler | GAZ |
| Model | 1609 | M-20 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 1918 cc | 2120 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1460 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2710 mm |
