1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1976 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Chrysler 1609 (100 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 110 kg more than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chrysler 1609 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | 1609 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2540 mm |
