1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 1976 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,918 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Chrysler 1609 (59 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Chrysler 1609. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 1609 | 1962 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chrysler | DKW |
Model | 1609 | Munga |
Year Released | 1976 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1918 cc | 979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2010 mm |