1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 1976 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Chrysler 1609 (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 10 kg more than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Chrysler 1609. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 1609 | 1963 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chrysler | DKW |
Model | 1609 | Munga |
Year Released | 1976 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2010 mm |