1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1966 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1976 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (59 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 89 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Chrysler 1609 (126 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1976 Chrysler 1609 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chrysler 1609 | 1966 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 1609 | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1918 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1136 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2420 mm |
