1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1982 Ford Monarch
To start off, 1982 Ford Monarch is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Monarch weights approximately 368 kg more than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Ford Monarch has automatic transmission and 1976 Chrysler 1609 has manual transmission. 1976 Chrysler 1609 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Ford Monarch will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 1609 | 1982 Ford Monarch | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 1609 | Monarch |
Year Released | 1976 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 4122 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2800 mm |