1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1982 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1982 Mercury Cougar is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 380 kg more than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 1609 | 1982 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
Model | 1609 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1976 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2650 mm |